Is Silent eHMI Enough? A Passenger-Centric Study on Effective eHMI for Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicles in the Field
May 29, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International journal of human computer interactions
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hailong Liu, Yang Li, Zhe Zeng, Hao Cheng, Chen Peng, Takahiro Wada
arXiv ID
2305.17862
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
9
Venue
International journal of human computer interactions
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Autonomous Personal Mobility Vehicle (APMV) is a miniaturized autonomous vehicle designed to provide short-distance mobility to everyone in pedestrian-rich environments. By the characteristic of the open design, passengers on the APMV are exposed to the communication between the eHMI deployed on APMVs and pedestrians. Therefore, to ensure an optimal passenger experience, eHMI designs for APMVs must consider the potential impact of APMV-pedestrian communications on passengers' subjective feelings. To this end, this study discussed three external human-machine interface (eHMI) designs, i.e., 1) graphical user interface (GUI)-based eHMI with text message (eHMI-T), 2) multimodal user interface (MUI)-based eHMI with neutral voice (eHMI-NV), and 3) MUI-based eHMI with affective voice (eHMI-AV), from the perspective of APMV passengers in the communication between APMV and pedestrians. In the riding field experiment (N=24), we found that eHMI-T may be less suitable for APMVs. This conclusion was drawn based on passengers' feedback, as they expressed an awkward feeling during the "silent time" when the eHMI-T provided information only to pedestrians but not to passengers. Additionally, these two MUI-based eHMIs with voice cues had their own advantages, i.e., eHMI-NV has an advantage in pragmatic quality, while eHMI-AV has an advantage in hedonic quality. The study also highlights the necessity of considering passengers' personalities when desig
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted