On the Generalized Mean Densest Subgraph Problem: Complexity and Algorithms
June 03, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Chandra Chekuri, Manuel R. Torres
arXiv ID
2306.02172
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
5
Venue
International Workshop and International Workshop on Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Dense subgraph discovery is an important problem in graph mining and network analysis with several applications. Two canonical problems here are to find a maxcore (subgraph of maximum min degree) and to find a densest subgraph (subgraph of maximum average degree). Both of these problems can be solved in polynomial time. Veldt, Benson, and Kleinberg [VBK21] introduced the generalized $p$-mean densest subgraph problem which captures the maxcore problem when $p=-\infty$ and the densest subgraph problem when $p=1$. They observed that the objective leads to a supermodular function when $p \ge 1$ and hence can be solved in polynomial time; for this case, they also developed a simple greedy peeling algorithm with a bounded approximation ratio. In this paper, we make several contributions. First, we prove that for any $p \in (-\frac{1}{8}, 0) \cup (0, \frac{1}{4})$ the problem is NP-Hard and for any $p \in (-3,0) \cup (0,1)$ the weighted version of the problem is NP-Hard, partly resolving a question left open in [VBK21]. Second, we describe two simple $1/2$-approximation algorithms for all $p < 1$, and show that our analysis of these algorithms is tight. For $p > 1$ we develop a fast near-linear time implementation of the greedy peeling algorithm from [VBK21]. This allows us to plug it into the iterative peeling algorithm that was shown to converge to an optimum solution [CQT22]. We demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms by running extensive experiments on large graphs. Together, our results provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of the $p$-mean densest subgraph problem and lead to fast and provably good algorithms for the full range of $p$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted