Deterministic and Work-Efficient Parallel Batch-Dynamic Trees in Low Span
June 14, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Daniel Anderson, Guy E. Blelloch
arXiv ID
2306.08786
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DC
Citations
2
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Dynamic trees are a well-studied and fundamental building block of dynamic graph algorithms dating back to the seminal work of Sleator and Tarjan [STOC'81, (1981), pp. 114-122]. The problem is to maintain a tree subject to online edge insertions and deletions while answering queries about the tree, such as the heaviest weight on a path, etc. In the parallel batch-dynamic setting, the goal is to process batches of edge updates work efficiently in low ($\text{polylog}\ n$) span. Two work-efficient algorithms are known, batch-parallel Euler Tour Trees by Tseng et al. [ALENEX'19, (2019), pp. 92-106] and parallel Rake-Compress (RC) Trees by Acar et al. [ESA'20, (2020), pp. 2:1-2:23]. Both however are randomized and work efficient in expectation. Several downstream results that use these data structures (and indeed to the best of our knowledge, all known work-efficient parallel batch-dynamic graph algorithms) are therefore also randomized. In this work, we give the first deterministic work-efficient solution to the problem. Our algorithm maintains a dynamic parallel tree contraction subject to batches of $k$ edge updates deterministically in worst-case $O(k \log(1 + n/k))$ work and $O(\log n \log^{(c)} k)$ span for any constant $c$. This allows us to implement parallel batch-dynamic RC-Trees with worst-case $O(k \log(1 + n/k))$ work updates and queries deterministically. Our techniques that we use to obtain the given span bound can also be applied to the state-of-the-art randomized variant of the algorithm to improve its span from $O(\log n \log^* n)$ to $O(\log n)$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted