MB-HGCN: A Hierarchical Graph Convolutional Network for Multi-behavior Recommendation

June 19, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mingshi Yan, Zhiyong Cheng, Jing Sun, Fuming Sun, Yuxin Peng arXiv ID 2306.10679 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 13 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Collaborative filtering-based recommender systems that rely on a single type of behavior often encounter serious sparsity issues in real-world applications, leading to unsatisfactory performance. Multi-behavior Recommendation (MBR) is a method that seeks to learn user preferences, represented as vector embeddings, from auxiliary information. By leveraging these preferences for target behavior recommendations, MBR addresses the sparsity problem and improves the accuracy of recommendations. In this paper, we propose MB-HGCN, a novel multi-behavior recommendation model that uses a hierarchical graph convolutional network to learn user and item embeddings from coarse-grained on the global level to fine-grained on the behavior-specific level. Our model learns global embeddings from a unified homogeneous graph constructed by the interactions of all behaviors, which are then used as initialized embeddings for behavior-specific embedding learning in each behavior graph. We also emphasize the distinct of the user and item behaviorspecific embeddings and design two simple-yet-effective strategies to aggregate the behavior-specific embeddings for users and items, respectively. Finally, we adopt multi-task learning for optimization. Extensive experimental results on three real-world datasets demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the baselines, achieving a relative improvement of 73.93% and 74.21% for HR@10 and NDCG@10, respectively, on the Tmall datasets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted