ChatGPT as a tool for User Story Quality Evaluation: Trustworthy Out of the Box?

June 21, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› XP Workshops

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Krishna Ronanki, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Christian Berger arXiv ID 2306.12132 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 30 Venue XP Workshops Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In Agile software development, user stories play a vital role in capturing and conveying end-user needs, prioritizing features, and facilitating communication and collaboration within development teams. However, automated methods for evaluating user stories require training in NLP tools and can be time-consuming to develop and integrate. This study explores using ChatGPT for user story quality evaluation and compares its performance with an existing benchmark. Our study shows that ChatGPT's evaluation aligns well with human evaluation, and we propose a ``best of three'' strategy to improve its output stability. We also discuss the concept of trustworthiness in AI and its implications for non-experts using ChatGPT's unprocessed outputs. Our research contributes to understanding the reliability and applicability of AI in user story evaluation and offers recommendations for future research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted