Scheduling with a Limited Testing Budget

June 27, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Embedded Systems and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Christoph Damerius, Peter Kling, Minming Li, Chenyang Xu, Ruilong Zhang arXiv ID 2306.15597 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue Embedded Systems and Applications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Scheduling with testing falls under the umbrella of the research on optimization with explorable uncertainty. In this model, each job has an upper limit on its processing time that can be decreased to a lower limit (possibly unknown) by some preliminary action (testing). Recently, D{ΓΌ}rr et al. \cite{DBLP:journals/algorithmica/DurrEMM20} has studied a setting where testing a job takes a unit time, and the goal is to minimize total completion time or makespan on a single machine. In this paper, we extend their problem to the budget setting in which each test consumes a job-specific cost, and we require that the total testing cost cannot exceed a given budget. We consider the offline variant (the lower processing time is known) and the oblivious variant (the lower processing time is unknown) and aim to minimize the total completion time or makespan on a single machine. For the total completion time objective, we show NP-hardness and derive a PTAS for the offline variant based on a novel LP rounding scheme. We give a $(4+Ξ΅)$-competitive algorithm for the oblivious variant based on a framework inspired by the worst-case lower-bound instance. For the makespan objective, we give an FPTAS for the offline variant and a $(2+Ξ΅)$-competitive algorithm for the oblivious variant. Our algorithms for the oblivious variants under both objectives run in time $O(poly(n/Ξ΅))$. Lastly, we show that our results are essentially optimal by providing matching lower bounds.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted