Probing the Transition to Dataset-Level Privacy in ML Models Using an Output-Specific and Data-Resolved Privacy Profile

June 27, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› AISec@CCS

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tyler LeBlond, Joseph Munoz, Fred Lu, Maya Fuchs, Elliott Zaresky-Williams, Edward Raff, Brian Testa arXiv ID 2306.15790 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.CR Citations 3 Venue AISec@CCS Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) is the prevailing technique for protecting user data in machine learning models. However, deficits to this framework include a lack of clarity for selecting the privacy budget $ฮต$ and a lack of quantification for the privacy leakage for a particular data row by a particular trained model. We make progress toward these limitations and a new perspective by which to visualize DP results by studying a privacy metric that quantifies the extent to which a model trained on a dataset using a DP mechanism is ``covered" by each of the distributions resulting from training on neighboring datasets. We connect this coverage metric to what has been established in the literature and use it to rank the privacy of individual samples from the training set in what we call a privacy profile. We additionally show that the privacy profile can be used to probe an observed transition to indistinguishability that takes place in the neighboring distributions as $ฮต$ decreases, which we suggest is a tool that can enable the selection of $ฮต$ by the ML practitioner wishing to make use of DP.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted