How Do Human Users Teach a Continual Learning Robot in Repeated Interactions?

June 30, 2023 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

๐Ÿ’ค TWILIGHT: Eternal Rest
Repo abandoned since publication

Repo contents: LICENSE, README.md, app, build.gradle, fetchAPI, fetchGuiServer.py, fetchGuiServer_Python2.py, fsilGUI.py, gradle.properties, gradle, gradlew, gradlew.bat, learned_image_counter.py, lifelong_learning, participant_models.json, res, settings.gradle, temp.csv, test_object_count.py, utils.py

Authors Ali Ayub, Jainish Mehta, Zachary De Francesco, Patrick Holthaus, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv arXiv ID 2307.00123 Category cs.RO: Robotics Cross-listed cs.HC, cs.LG Citations 4 Venue IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication Repository https://github.com/aliayub7/cl_hri โญ 6 Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Continual learning (CL) has emerged as an important avenue of research in recent years, at the intersection of Machine Learning (ML) and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), to allow robots to continually learn in their environments over long-term interactions with humans. Most research in continual learning, however, has been robot-centered to develop continual learning algorithms that can quickly learn new information on static datasets. In this paper, we take a human-centered approach to continual learning, to understand how humans teach continual learning robots over the long term and if there are variations in their teaching styles. We conducted an in-person study with 40 participants that interacted with a continual learning robot in 200 sessions. In this between-participant study, we used two different CL models deployed on a Fetch mobile manipulator robot. An extensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of the data collected in the study shows that there is significant variation among the teaching styles of individual users indicating the need for personalized adaptation to their distinct teaching styles. The results also show that although there is a difference in the teaching styles between expert and non-expert users, the style does not have an effect on the performance of the continual learning robot. Finally, our analysis shows that the constrained experimental setups that have been widely used to test most continual learning techniques are not adequate, as real users interact with and teach continual learning robots in a variety of ways. Our code is available at https://github.com/aliayub7/cl_hri.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Robotics