Explanation Needs in App Reviews: Taxonomy and Automated Detection

July 10, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Max Unterbusch, Mersedeh Sadeghi, Jannik Fischbach, Martin Obaidi, Andreas Vogelsang arXiv ID 2307.04367 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 14 Venue 2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Explainability, i.e. the ability of a system to explain its behavior to users, has become an important quality of software-intensive systems. Recent work has focused on methods for generating explanations for various algorithmic paradigms (e.g., machine learning, self-adaptive systems). There is relatively little work on what situations and types of behavior should be explained. There is also a lack of support for eliciting explainability requirements. In this work, we explore the need for explanation expressed by users in app reviews. We manually coded a set of 1,730 app reviews from 8 apps and derived a taxonomy of Explanation Needs. We also explore several approaches to automatically identify Explanation Needs in app reviews. Our best classifier identifies Explanation Needs in 486 unseen reviews of 4 different apps with a weighted F-score of 86%. Our work contributes to a better understanding of users' Explanation Needs. Automated tools can help engineers focus on these needs and ultimately elicit valid Explanation Needs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted