On Detecting Some Defective Items in Group Testing
June 27, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Computing and Combinatorics Conference
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Nader H. Bshouty, Catherine A. Haddad-Zaknoon
arXiv ID
2307.04822
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.LG
Citations
0
Venue
International Computing and Combinatorics Conference
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Group testing is an approach aimed at identifying up to $d$ defective items among a total of $n$ elements. This is accomplished by examining subsets to determine if at least one defective item is present. In our study, we focus on the problem of identifying a subset of $\ell\leq d$ defective items. We develop upper and lower bounds on the number of tests required to detect $\ell$ defective items in both the adaptive and non-adaptive settings while considering scenarios where no prior knowledge of $d$ is available, and situations where an estimate of $d$ or at least some non-trivial upper bound on $d$ is available. When no prior knowledge on $d$ is available, we prove a lower bound of $ Ξ©(\frac{\ell \log^2n}{\log \ell +\log\log n})$ tests in the randomized non-adaptive settings and an upper bound of $O(\ell \log^2 n)$ for the same settings. Furthermore, we demonstrate that any non-adaptive deterministic algorithm must ask $Ξ(n)$ tests, signifying a fundamental limitation in this scenario. For adaptive algorithms, we establish tight bounds in different scenarios. In the deterministic case, we prove a tight bound of $Ξ(\ell\log{(n/\ell)})$. Moreover, in the randomized settings, we derive a tight bound of $Ξ(\ell\log{(n/d)})$. When $d$, or at least some non-trivial estimate of $d$, is known, we prove a tight bound of $Ξ(d\log (n/d))$ for the deterministic non-adaptive settings, and $Ξ(\ell\log(n/d))$ for the randomized non-adaptive settings. In the adaptive case, we present an upper bound of $O(\ell \log (n/\ell))$ for the deterministic settings, and a lower bound of $Ξ©(\ell\log(n/d)+\log n)$. Additionally, we establish a tight bound of $Ξ(\ell \log(n/d))$ for the randomized adaptive settings.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted