Smoothed Analysis of the Komlรณs Conjecture: Rademacher Noise

July 12, 2023 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Electronic Journal of Combinatorics

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elad Aigner-Horev, Dan Hefetz, Michael Trushkin arXiv ID 2307.06285 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.IT, math.PR Citations 2 Venue Electronic Journal of Combinatorics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
The {\em discrepancy} of a matrix $M \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times n}$ is given by $\mathrm{DISC}(M) := \min_{\boldsymbol{x} \in \{-1,1\}^n} \|M\boldsymbol{x}\|_\infty$. An outstanding conjecture, attributed to Komlรณs, stipulates that $\mathrm{DISC}(M) = O(1)$, whenever $M$ is a Komlรณs matrix, that is, whenever every column of $M$ lies within the unit sphere. Our main result asserts that $\mathrm{DISC}(M + R/\sqrt{d}) = O(d^{-1/2})$ holds asymptotically almost surely, whenever $M \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times n}$ is Komlรณs, $R \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times n}$ is a Rademacher random matrix, $d = ฯ‰(1)$, and $n = ฯ‰(d \log d)$. The factor $d^{-1/2}$ normalising $R$ is essentially best possible and the dependency between $n$ and $d$ is asymptotically best possible. Our main source of inspiration is a result by Bansal, Jiang, Meka, Singla, and Sinha (ICALP 2022). They obtained an assertion similar to the one above in the case that the smoothing matrix is Gaussian. They asked whether their result can be attained with the optimal dependency $n = ฯ‰(d \log d)$ in the case of Bernoulli random noise or any other types of discretely distributed noise; the latter types being more conducive for Smoothed Analysis in other discrepancy settings such as the Beck-Fiala problem. For Bernoulli noise, their method works if $n = ฯ‰(d^2)$. In the case of Rademacher noise, we answer the question posed by Bansal, Jiang, Meka, Singla, and Sinha. Our proof builds upon their approach in a strong way and provides a discrete version of the latter. Breaking the $n = ฯ‰(d^2)$ barrier and reaching the optimal dependency $n = ฯ‰(d \log d)$ for Rademacher noise requires additional ideas expressed through a rather meticulous counting argument, incurred by the need to maintain a high level of precision all throughout the discretisation process.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Combinatorics

๐Ÿ”ฎ ๐Ÿ”ฎ The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO ๐Ÿ› arXiv ๐Ÿ“š 94 cites 10 years ago