Accurate deep learning sub-grid scale models for large eddy simulations
July 19, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rikhi Bose, Arunabha M. Roy
arXiv ID
2307.10060
Category
physics.flu-dyn
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.LG,
cs.NE,
physics.comp-ph
Citations
12
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We present two families of sub-grid scale (SGS) turbulence models developed for large-eddy simulation (LES) purposes. Their development required the formulation of physics-informed robust and efficient Deep Learning (DL) algorithms which, unlike state-of-the-art analytical modeling techniques can produce high-order complex non-linear relations between inputs and outputs. Explicit filtering of data from direct simulations of the canonical channel flow at two friction Reynolds numbers $Re_Ο\approx 395$ and 590 provided accurate data for training and testing. The two sets of models use different network architectures. One of the architectures uses tensor basis neural networks (TBNN) and embeds the simplified analytical model form of the general effective-viscosity hypothesis, thus incorporating the Galilean, rotational and reflectional invariances. The other architecture is that of a relatively simple network, that is able to incorporate the Galilean invariance only. However, this simpler architecture has better feature extraction capacity owing to its ability to establish relations between and extract information from cross-components of the integrity basis tensors and the SGS stresses. Both sets of models are used to predict the SGS stresses for feature datasets generated with different filter widths, and at different Reynolds numbers. It is shown that due to the simpler model's better feature learning capabilities, it outperforms the invariance embedded model in statistical performance metrics. In a priori tests, both sets of models provide similar levels of dissipation and backscatter. Based on the test results, both sets of models should be usable in a posteriori actual LESs.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.flu-dyn
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Efficient collective swimming by harnessing vortices through deep reinforcement learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
NVIDIA SimNet^{TM}: an AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Teaching the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations to Fast Neural Surrogate Models in 3D
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-Number Turbulent Boundary Layers using Physics-Informed Machine Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: Diagnostics
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted