A Backend Platform for Supporting the Reproducibility of Computational Experiments
June 29, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
LΓ‘zaro Costa, Susana Barbosa, JΓ‘come Cunha
arXiv ID
2308.00703
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Cross-listed
cs.CE
Citations
2
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
In recent years, the research community has raised serious questions about the reproducibility of scientific work. In particular, since many studies include some kind of computing work, reproducibility is also a technological challenge, not only in computer science, but in most research domains. Replicability and computational reproducibility are not easy to achieve, not only because researchers have diverse proficiency in computing technologies, but also because of the variety of computational environments that can be used. Indeed, it is challenging to recreate the same environment using the same frameworks, code, data sources, programming languages, dependencies, and so on. In this work, we propose an Integrated Development Environment allowing the share, configuration, packaging and execution of an experiment by setting the code and data used and defining the programming languages, code, dependencies, databases, or commands to execute to achieve consistent results for each experiment. After the initial creation and configuration, the experiment can be executed any number of times, always producing exactly the same results. Furthermore, it allows the execution of the experiment by using a different associated dataset, and it can be possible to verify the reproducibility and replicability of the results. This allows the creation of a reproducible pack that can be re-executed by anyone on any other computer. Our platform aims to allow researchers in any field to create a reproducibility package for their science that can be re-executed on any other computer. To evaluate our platform, we used it to reproduce 25 experiments extracted from published papers. We have been able to successfully reproduce 20 (80%) of these experiments achieving the results reported in such works with minimum effort, thus showing that our approach is effective.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted