Notably Inaccessible -- Data Driven Understanding of Data Science Notebook (In)Accessibility

August 07, 2023 ยท Entered Twilight ยท ๐Ÿ› International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

๐Ÿ’ค TWILIGHT: Eternal Rest
Repo abandoned since publication

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Code repo scraped from project page (backfill)"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Repo contents: .github, .gitignore, Accessibility Scan.ipynb, CITATION.cff, Image Analysis.ipynb, LICENSE, Notebook Characteristics.ipynb, Notebook Customizability.ipynb, Notebook Navigability.ipynb, Pipeline Description.ipynb, Popular Imports From Usage.ipynb, README.md, Table of Contents.ipynb, accessiblePreprint-notably-inaccessible.pdf, data_out, helper, model, pipeline, plot_out, uw-cse.png

Authors Venkatesh Potluri, Sudheesh Singanamalla, Nussara Tieanklin, Jennifer Mankoff arXiv ID 2308.03241 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CY, cs.SE Citations 9 Venue International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility Repository https://github.com/make4all/notebooka11y โญ 4 Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Computational notebooks, tools that facilitate storytelling through exploration, data analysis, and information visualization, have become the widely accepted standard in the data science community. These notebooks have been widely adopted through notebook software such as Jupyter, Datalore and Google Colab, both in academia and industry. While there is extensive research to learn how data scientists use computational notebooks, identify their pain points, and enable collaborative data science practices, very little is known about the various accessibility barriers experienced by blind and visually impaired (BVI) users using these notebooks. BVI users are unable to use computational notebook interfaces due to (1) inaccessibility of the interface, (2) common ways in which data is represented in these interfaces, and (3) inability for popular libraries to provide accessible outputs. We perform a large scale systematic analysis of 100000 Jupyter notebooks to identify various accessibility challenges in published notebooks affecting the creation and consumption of these notebooks. Through our findings, we make recommendations to improve accessibility of the artifacts of a notebook, suggest authoring practices, and propose changes to infrastructure to make notebooks accessible. An accessible PDF can be obtained at https://blvi.dev/noteably-inaccessible-paper
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction