On the Perception of Small Sub-graphs

August 07, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium Graph Drawing and Network Visualization

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jacob Miller, Mohammad Ghoniem, Hsiang-Yun Wu, Helen C. Purchase arXiv ID 2308.03890 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 1 Venue International Symposium Graph Drawing and Network Visualization Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Interpreting a node-link graph is enhanced if similar subgraphs (or motifs) are depicted in a similar manner; that is, they have the same visual form. Small motifs within graphs may be perceived to be identical when they are structurally dissimilar, or may be perceived to be dissimilar when they are identical. This issue primarily relates to the Gestalt principle of similarity, but may also include an element of quick, low-level pattern-matching. We believe that if motifs are identical, they should be depicted identically; if they are nearly-identical, they should be depicted nearly-identically. This principle is particularly important in domains where motifs hold meaning and where their identification is important. We identified five small motifs: bi-cliques, cliques, cycles, double-cycles, and stars. For each, we defined visual variations on two dimensions: same or different structure, same or different shape. We conducted a crowd-sourced empirical study to test the perception of similarity of these varied motifs, and found that determining whether motifs are identical or similar is affected by both shape and structure.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted