The Scientometrics and Reciprocality Underlying Co-Authorship Panels in Google Scholar Profiles

August 14, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Scientometrics

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ariel Alexi, Teddy Lazebnik, Ariel Rosenfeld arXiv ID 2308.07001 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.IR, cs.SI Citations 7 Venue Scientometrics Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Online academic profiles are used by scholars to reflect a desired image to their online audience. In Google Scholar, scholars can select a subset of co-authors for presentation in a central location on their profile using a social feature called the Co-authroship panel. In this work, we examine whether scientometrics and reciprocality can explain the observed selections. To this end, we scrape and thoroughly analyze a novel set of 120,000 Google Scholar profiles, ranging across four disciplines and various academic institutions. Our results suggest that scholars tend to favor co-authors with higher scientometrics over others for inclusion in their co-authorship panels. Interestingly, as one's own scientometrics are higher, the tendency to include co-authors with high scientometrics is diminishing. Furthermore, we find that reciprocality is central to explaining scholars' selections.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted