The Partner Modelling Questionnaire: A validated self-report measure of perceptions toward machines as dialogue partners

August 14, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Philip R. Doyle, Iona Gessinger, Justin Edwards, Leigh Clark, Odile Dumbleton, Diego Garaialde, Daniel Rough, Anna Bleakley, Holly P. Branigan, Benjamin R. Cowan arXiv ID 2308.07164 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 10 Venue ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Recent work has looked to understand user perceptions of speech agent capabilities as dialogue partners (termed partner models), and how this affects user interaction. Yet, currently partner model effects are inferred from language production as no metrics are available to quantify these subjective perceptions more directly. Through three studies, we develop and validate the Partner Modelling Questionnaire (PMQ): an 18-item self-report semantic differential scale designed to reliably measure people's partner models of non-embodied speech interfaces. Through principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, we show that the PMQ scale consists of three factors: communicative competence and dependability, human-likeness in communication, and communicative flexibility. Our studies show that the measure consistently demonstrates good internal reliability, strong test-retest reliability over 12 and 4-week intervals, and predictable convergent/divergent validity. Based on our findings we discuss the multidimensional nature of partner models, whilst identifying key future research avenues that the development of the PMQ facilitates. Notably, this includes the need to identify the activation, sensitivity, and dynamism of partner models in speech interface interaction.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted