Fast Gao-like Decoding of Horizontally Interleaved Linearized Reed-Solomon Codes

August 22, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› CBCrypto

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Felicitas HΓΆrmann, Hannes Bartz arXiv ID 2308.11328 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 1 Venue CBCrypto Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Both horizontal interleaving as well as the sum-rank metric are currently attractive topics in the field of code-based cryptography, as they could mitigate the problem of large key sizes. In contrast to vertical interleaving, where codewords are stacked vertically, each codeword of a horizontally $s$-interleaved code is the horizontal concatenation of $s$ codewords of $s$ component codes. In the case of horizontally interleaved linearized Reed-Solomon (HILRS) codes, these component codes are chosen to be linearized Reed-Solomon (LRS) codes. We provide a Gao-like decoder for HILRS codes that is inspired by the respective works for non-interleaved Reed-Solomon and Gabidulin codes. By applying techniques from the theory of minimal approximant bases, we achieve a complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(s^{2.373} n^{1.635})$ operations in $\mathbb{F}_{q^m}$, where $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\cdot)$ neglects logarithmic factors, $s$ is the interleaving order and $n$ denotes the length of the component codes. For reasonably small interleaving order $s \ll n$, this is subquadratic in the component-code length $n$ and improves over the only known syndrome-based decoder for HILRS codes with quadratic complexity. Moreover, it closes the performance gap to vertically interleaved LRS codes for which a decoder of complexity $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(s^{2.373} n^{1.635})$ is already known. We can decode beyond the unique-decoding radius and handle errors of sum-rank weight up to $\frac{s}{s + 1} (n - k)$ for component-code dimension $k$. We also give an upper bound on the failure probability in the zero-derivation setting and validate its tightness via Monte Carlo simulations.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted