A Comprehensive Survey for Evaluation Methodologies of AI-Generated Music

August 26, 2023 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: A Comprehensive Survey for Evaluation Methodologies of AI-Generated Music"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zeyu Xiong, Weitao Wang, Jing Yu, Yue Lin, Ziyan Wang arXiv ID 2308.13736 Category cs.SD: Sound Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.HC, eess.AS Citations 14 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 days ago
Abstract
In recent years, AI-generated music has made significant progress, with several models performing well in multimodal and complex musical genres and scenes. While objective metrics can be used to evaluate generative music, they often lack interpretability for musical evaluation. Therefore, researchers often resort to subjective user studies to assess the quality of the generated works, which can be resource-intensive and less reproducible than objective metrics. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the subjective, objective, and combined methodologies for assessing AI-generated music, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Ultimately, this study provides a valuable reference for unifying generative AI in the field of music evaluation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Sound