Recursive Error Reduction for Regular Branching Programs

September 08, 2023 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Information Technology Convergence and Services

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Eshan Chattopadhyay, Jyun-Jie Liao arXiv ID 2309.04551 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 1 Venue Information Technology Convergence and Services Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
In a recent work, Chen, Hoza, Lyu, Tal and Wu (FOCS 2023) showed an improved error reduction framework for the derandomization of regular read-once branching programs (ROBPs). Their result is based on a clever modification to the inverse Laplacian perspective of space-bounded derandomization, which was originally introduced by Ahmadinejad, Kelner, Murtagh, Peebles, Sidford and Vadhan (FOCS 2020). In this work, we give an alternative error reduction framework for regular ROBPs. Our new framework is based on a binary recursive formula from the work of Chattopadhyay and Liao (CCC 2020), that they used to construct weighted pseudorandom generators (WPRGs) for general ROBPs. Based on our new error reduction framework, we give alternative proofs to the following results for regular ROBPs of length $n$ and width $w$, both of which were proved in the work of Chen et al. using their error reduction: $\bullet$ There is a WPRG with error $\varepsilon$ that has seed length $\tilde{O}(\log(n)(\sqrt{\log(1/\varepsilon)}+\log(w))+\log(1/\varepsilon)).$ $\bullet$ There is a (non-black-box) deterministic algorithm which estimates the expectation of any such program within error $\pm\varepsilon$ with space complexity $\tilde{O}(\log(nw)\cdot\log\log(1/\varepsilon)).$ (This was first proved in the work of Ahmadinejad et al., but the proof by Chen et al. is simpler.) Because of the binary recursive nature of our new framework, both of our proofs are based on a straightforward induction that is arguably simpler than the Laplacian-based proof in the work of Chen et al.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity