A Full-fledged Commit Message Quality Checker Based on Machine Learning

September 09, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors David FaragΓ³, Michael FΓ€rber, Christian Petrov arXiv ID 2309.04797 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.LG Citations 3 Venue Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Commit messages (CMs) are an essential part of version control. By providing important context in regard to what has changed and why, they strongly support software maintenance and evolution. But writing good CMs is difficult and often neglected by developers. So far, there is no tool suitable for practice that automatically assesses how well a CM is written, including its meaning and context. Since this task is challenging, we ask the research question: how well can the CM quality, including semantics and context, be measured with machine learning methods? By considering all rules from the most popular CM quality guideline, creating datasets for those rules, and training and evaluating state-of-the-art machine learning models to check those rules, we can answer the research question with: sufficiently well for practice, with the lowest F$_1$ score of 82.9\%, for the most challenging task. We develop a full-fledged open-source framework that checks all these CM quality rules. It is useful for research, e.g., automatic CM generation, but most importantly for software practitioners to raise the quality of CMs and thus the maintainability and evolution speed of their software.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted