Mostree : Malicious Secure Private Decision Tree Evaluation with Sublinear Communication

September 29, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jianli Bai, Xiangfu Song, Xiaowu Zhang, Qifan Wang, Shujie Cui, Ee-Chien Chang, Giovanni Russello arXiv ID 2309.17124 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 12 Venue Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A private decision tree evaluation (PDTE) protocol allows a feature vector owner (FO) to classify its data using a tree model from a model owner (MO) and only reveals an inference result to the FO. This paper proposes Mostree, a PDTE protocol secure in the presence of malicious parties with sublinear communication. We design Mostree in the three-party honest-majority setting, where an (untrusted) computing party (CP) assists the FO and MO in the secure computation. We propose two low-communication oblivious selection (OS) protocols by exploiting nice properties of three-party replicated secret sharing (RSS) and distributed point function. Mostree combines OS protocols with a tree encoding method and three-party secure computation to achieve sublinear communication. We observe that most of the protocol components already maintain privacy even in the presence of a malicious adversary, and what remains to achieve is correctness. To ensure correctness, we propose a set of lightweight consistency checks and seamlessly integrate them into Mostree. As a result, Mostree achieves sublinear communication and malicious security simultaneously. We implement Mostree and compare it with the state-of-the-art. Experimental results demonstrate that Mostree is efficient and comparable to semi-honest PDTE schemes with sublinear communication. For instance, when evaluated on the MNIST dataset in a LAN setting, Mostree achieves an evaluation using approximately 768 ms with communication of around 168 KB.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted