Bandwidth Parameterized by Cluster Vertex Deletion Number

September 29, 2023 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Algorithmica

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tatsuya Gima, Eun Jung Kim, Noleen Köhler, Nikolaos Melissinos, Manolis Vasilakis arXiv ID 2309.17204 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC Citations 3 Venue Algorithmica Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given a graph $G$ and an integer $b$, Bandwidth asks whether there exists a bijection $π$ from $V(G)$ to $\{1, \ldots, |V(G)|\}$ such that $\max_{\{u, v \} \in E(G)} | π(u) - π(v) | \leq b$. This is a classical NP-complete problem, known to remain NP-complete even on very restricted classes of graphs, such as trees of maximum degree 3 and caterpillars of hair length 3. In the realm of parameterized complexity, these results imply that the problem remains NP-hard on graphs of bounded pathwidth, while it is additionally known to be W[1]-hard when parameterized by the tree-depth of the input graph. In contrast, the problem does become FPT when parameterized by the vertex cover number. In this paper we make progress in understanding the parameterized (in)tractability of Bandwidth. We first show that it is FPT when parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number cvd plus the clique number $ω$, thus significantly strengthening the previously mentioned result for vertex cover number. On the other hand, we show that Bandwidth is W[1]-hard when parameterized only by cvd. Our results develop and generalize some of the methods of argumentation of the previous results and narrow some of the complexity gaps.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted