Context-Based Tweet Engagement Prediction

September 28, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jovan Jeromela arXiv ID 2310.03147 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.LG, cs.SI Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Twitter is currently one of the biggest social media platforms. Its users may share, read, and engage with short posts called tweets. For the ACM Recommender Systems Conference 2020, Twitter published a dataset around 70 GB in size for the annual RecSys Challenge. In 2020, the RecSys Challenge invited participating teams to create models that would predict engagement likelihoods for given user-tweet combinations. The submitted models predicting like, reply, retweet, and quote engagements were evaluated based on two metrics: area under the precision-recall curve (PRAUC) and relative cross-entropy (RCE). In this diploma thesis, we used the RecSys 2020 Challenge dataset and evaluation procedure to investigate how well context alone may be used to predict tweet engagement likelihood. In doing so, we employed the Spark engine on TU Wien's Little Big Data Cluster to create scalable data preprocessing, feature engineering, feature selection, and machine learning pipelines. We manually created just under 200 additional features to describe tweet context. The results indicate that features describing users' prior engagement history and the popularity of hashtags and links in the tweet were the most informative. We also found that factors such as the prediction algorithm, training dataset size, training dataset sampling method, and feature selection significantly affect the results. After comparing the best results of our context-only prediction models with content-only models and with models developed by the Challenge winners, we identified that the context-based models underperformed in terms of the RCE score. This work thus concludes by situating this discrepancy and proposing potential improvements to our implementation, which is shared in a public git repository.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted