Faster Algorithms for Generalized Mean Densest Subgraph Problem

October 17, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Chenglin Fan, Ping Li, Hanyu Peng arXiv ID 2310.11377 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.LG, stat.ML Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The densest subgraph of a large graph usually refers to some subgraph with the highest average degree, which has been extended to the family of $p$-means dense subgraph objectives by~\citet{veldt2021generalized}. The $p$-mean densest subgraph problem seeks a subgraph with the highest average $p$-th-power degree, whereas the standard densest subgraph problem seeks a subgraph with a simple highest average degree. It was shown that the standard peeling algorithm can perform arbitrarily poorly on generalized objective when $p>1$ but uncertain when $0<p<1$. In this paper, we are the first to show that a standard peeling algorithm can still yield $2^{1/p}$-approximation for the case $0<p < 1$. (Veldt 2021) proposed a new generalized peeling algorithm (GENPEEL), which for $p \geq 1$ has an approximation guarantee ratio $(p+1)^{1/p}$, and time complexity $O(mn)$, where $m$ and $n$ denote the number of edges and nodes in graph respectively. In terms of algorithmic contributions, we propose a new and faster generalized peeling algorithm (called GENPEEL++ in this paper), which for $p \in [1, +\infty)$ has an approximation guarantee ratio $(2(p+1))^{1/p}$, and time complexity $O(m(\log n))$, where $m$ and $n$ denote the number of edges and nodes in graph, respectively. This approximation ratio converges to 1 as $p \rightarrow \infty$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted