Towards Simpler Sorting Networks and Monotone Circuits for Majority

October 18, 2023 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Natalia Dobrokhotova-Maikova, Alexander Kozachinskiy, Vladimir Podolskii arXiv ID 2310.12270 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 1 Venue Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of computing the majority function by low-depth monotone circuits and a related problem of constructing low-depth sorting networks. We consider both the classical setting with elementary operations of arity $2$ and the generalized setting with operations of arity $k$, where $k$ is a parameter. For both problems and both settings, there are various constructions known, the minimal known depth being logarithmic. However, there is currently no known construction that simultaneously achieves sub-log-squared depth, effective constructability, simplicity, and has a potential to be used in practice. In this paper we make progress towards resolution of this problem. For computing majority by standard monotone circuits (gates of arity 2) we provide an explicit monotone circuit of depth $O(\log_2^{5/3} n)$. The construction is a combination of several known and not too complicated ideas. For arbitrary arity of gates $k$ we provide a new sorting network architecture inspired by representation of inputs as a high-dimensional cube. As a result we provide a simple construction that improves previous upper bound of $4 \log_k^2 n$ to $2 \log_k^2 n$. We prove the similar bound for the depth of the circuit computing majority of $n$ bits consisting of gates computing majority of $k$ bits. Note, that for both problems there is an explicit construction of depth $O(\log_k n)$ known, but the construction is complicated and the constant hidden in $O$-notation is huge.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity