An Analysis of $D^α$ seeding for $k$-means

October 20, 2023 · Declared Dead · + Add venue

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Etienne Bamas, Sai Ganesh Nagarajan, Ola Svensson arXiv ID 2310.13474 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
One of the most popular clustering algorithms is the celebrated $D^α$ seeding algorithm (also know as $k$-means++ when $α=2$) by Arthur and Vassilvitskii (2007), who showed that it guarantees in expectation an $O(2^{2α}\cdot \log k)$-approximate solution to the ($k$,$α$)-means cost (where euclidean distances are raised to the power $α$) for any $α\ge 1$. More recently, Balcan, Dick, and White (2018) observed experimentally that using $D^α$ seeding with $α>2$ can lead to a better solution with respect to the standard $k$-means objective (i.e. the $(k,2)$-means cost). In this paper, we provide a rigorous understanding of this phenomenon. For any $α>2$, we show that $D^α$ seeding guarantees in expectation an approximation factor of $$ O_α\left((g_α)^{2/α}\cdot \left(\frac{σ_{\mathrm{max}}}{σ_{\mathrm{min}}}\right)^{2-4/α}\cdot (\min\{\ell,\log k\})^{2/α}\right)$$ with respect to the standard $k$-means cost of any underlying clustering; where $g_α$ is a parameter capturing the concentration of the points in each cluster, $σ_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $σ_{\mathrm{min}}$ are the maximum and minimum standard deviation of the clusters around their means, and $\ell$ is the number of distinct mixing weights in the underlying clustering (after rounding them to the nearest power of $2$). We complement these results by some lower bounds showing that the dependency on $g_α$ and $σ_{\mathrm{max}}/σ_{\mathrm{min}}$ is tight. Finally, we provide an experimental confirmation of the effects of the aforementioned parameters when using $D^α$ seeding. Further, we corroborate the observation that $α>2$ can indeed improve the $k$-means cost compared to $D^2$ seeding, and that this advantage remains even if we run Lloyd's algorithm after the seeding.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted