A PTAS for $\ell_0$-Low Rank Approximation: Solving Dense CSPs over Reals
November 01, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Vincent Cohen-Addad, Chenglin Fan, Suprovat Ghoshal, Euiwoong Lee, Arnaud de Mesmay, Alantha Newman, Tony Chang Wang
arXiv ID
2311.00892
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
1
Venue
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We consider the Low Rank Approximation problem, where the input consists of a matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n_R \times n_C}$ and an integer $k$, and the goal is to find a matrix $B$ of rank at most $k$ that minimizes $\| A - B \|_0$, which is the number of entries where $A$ and $B$ differ. For any constant $k$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, we present a polynomial time $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximation time for this problem, which significantly improves the previous best $poly(k)$-approximation. Our algorithm is obtained by viewing the problem as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) where each row and column becomes a variable that can have a value from $\mathbb{R}^k$. In this view, we have a constraint between each row and column, which results in a {\em dense} CSP, a well-studied topic in approximation algorithms. While most of previous algorithms focus on finite-size (or constant-size) domains and involve an exhaustive enumeration over the entire domain, we present a new framework that bypasses such an enumeration in $\mathbb{R}^k$. We also use tools from the rich literature of Low Rank Approximation in different objectives (e.g., $\ell_p$ with $p \in (0, \infty)$) or domains (e.g., finite fields/generalized Boolean). We believe that our techniques might be useful to study other real-valued CSPs and matrix optimization problems. On the hardness side, when $k$ is part of the input, we prove that Low Rank Approximation is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $Ξ©(\log n)$. This is the first superconstant NP-hardness of approximation for any $p \in [0, \infty]$ that does not rely on stronger conjectures (e.g., the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted