Does Differential Privacy Prevent Backdoor Attacks in Practice?

November 10, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Database Security

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Fereshteh Razmi, Jian Lou, Li Xiong arXiv ID 2311.06227 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 1 Venue Database Security Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) was originally developed to protect privacy. However, it has recently been utilized to secure machine learning (ML) models from poisoning attacks, with DP-SGD receiving substantial attention. Nevertheless, a thorough investigation is required to assess the effectiveness of different DP techniques in preventing backdoor attacks in practice. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of DP-SGD and, for the first time in literature, examine PATE in the context of backdoor attacks. We also explore the role of different components of DP algorithms in defending against backdoor attacks and will show that PATE is effective against these attacks due to the bagging structure of the teacher models it employs. Our experiments reveal that hyperparameters and the number of backdoors in the training dataset impact the success of DP algorithms. Additionally, we propose Label-DP as a faster and more accurate alternative to DP-SGD and PATE. We conclude that while Label-DP algorithms generally offer weaker privacy protection, accurate hyper-parameter tuning can make them more effective than DP methods in defending against backdoor attacks while maintaining model accuracy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted