On Algorithmic Cache Optimization
November 12, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Neil Bhavikatti
arXiv ID
2311.07615
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We study matrix-matrix multiplication of two matrices, $A$ and $B$, each of size $n \times n$. This operation results in a matrix $C$ of size $n\times n$. Our goal is to produce $C$ as efficiently as possible given a cache: a 1-D limited set of data values that we can work with to perform elementary operations (additions, multiplications, etc.). That is, we attempt to reuse the maximum amount of data from $A$, $B$ and $C$ during our computation (or equivalently, utilize data in the fast-access cache as often as possible). Firstly, we introduce the matrix-matrix multiplication algorithm. Secondly, we present a standard two-memory model to simulate the architecture of a computer, and we explain the LRU (Least Recently Used) Cache policy (which is standard in most computers). Thirdly, we introduce a basic model Cache Simulator, which possesses an $\mathcal{O}(M)$ time complexity (meaning we are limited to small $M$ values). Then we discuss and model the LFU (Least Frequently Used) Cache policy and the explicit control cache policy. Finally, we introduce the main result of this paper, the $\mathcal{O}(1)$ Cache Simulator, and use it to compare, experimentally, the savings of time, energy, and communication incurred from the ideal cache-efficient algorithm for matrix-matrix multiplication. The Cache Simulator simulates the amount of data movement that occurs between the main memory and the cache of the computer. One of the findings of this project is that, in some cases, there is a significant discrepancy in communication values between an LRU cache algorithm and explicit cache control. We propose to alleviate this problem by ``tricking'' the LRU cache algorithm by updating the timestamp of the data we want to keep in cache (namely entries of matrix $C$). This enables us to have the benefits of an explicit cache policy while being constrained by the LRU paradigm (realistic policy on a CPU).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted