Automating the Generation of Prompts for LLM-based Action Choice in PDDL Planning

November 16, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Katharina Stein, Daniel FiΕ‘er, JΓΆrg Hoffmann, Alexander Koller arXiv ID 2311.09830 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.CL Citations 20 Venue Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized a large variety of NLP tasks. An active debate is to what extent they can do reasoning and planning. Prior work has assessed the latter in the specific context of PDDL planning, based on manually converting three PDDL domains into natural language (NL) prompts. Here we automate this conversion step, showing how to leverage an LLM to automatically generate NL prompts from PDDL input. Our automatically generated NL prompts result in similar LLM-planning performance as the previous manually generated ones. Beyond this, the automation enables us to run much larger experiments, providing for the first time a broad evaluation of LLM planning performance in PDDL. Our NL prompts yield better performance than PDDL prompts and simple template-based NL prompts. Compared to symbolic planners, LLM planning lags far behind; but in some domains, our best LLM configuration scales up further than A$^\star$ using LM-cut.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted