Uncertainty-Aware Test Prioritization: Approaches and Empirical Evaluation
November 21, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Man Zhang, Jiahui Wu, Shaukat Ali, Tao Yue
arXiv ID
2311.12484
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Complex software systems, e.g., Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), interact with the real world; thus, they often behave unexpectedly in uncertain environments. Testing such systems is challenging due to limited resources, time, complex testing infrastructure setup, and the inherent uncertainties in their operating environment. Devising uncertainty-aware testing solutions supported with test optimization techniques can be considered as a mandate for tackling this challenge. This paper proposes an uncertainty-aware and time-aware test case prioritization approach, named UncerPrio, for optimizing a sequence of tests to execute with a multi-objective search. To guide the prioritization with uncertainty, we identify four uncertainty measures: uncertainty measurement (AUM), uncertainty space (PUS), the number of uncertainties (ANU), and uncertainty coverage (PUU). Based on these measures and their combinations, we proposed 10 uncertainty-aware and multi-objective test case prioritization problems, and each problem was additionally defined with one cost objective (execution cost, PET) to be minimized and one effective measure (model coverage, PTR) to be maximized. Moreover, considering time constraints for test executions (i.e., time-aware), we defined 10 time budgets for all the 10 problems for identifying the best strategy in solving uncertainty-aware test prioritization. In our empirical study, we employed four well-known Multi-Objective Search Algorithms (MuOSAs): NSGA-II, MOCell, SPEA2, and CellDE with five use cases from two industrial CPS subject systems, and used Random Algorithm (RS) as the comparison baseline. Results show that all the MuOSAs significantly outperformed RS. The strategy of Prob.6 f(PET,PTR,AUM,ANU) (i.e., the problem with uncertainty measures AUM and ANU combined) achieved the overall best performance in observing uncertainty when using 100% time budget.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted