On the Size Overhead of Pairwise Spanners

November 22, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Information Technology Convergence and Services

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ofer Neiman, Idan Shabat arXiv ID 2311.13673 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue Information Technology Convergence and Services Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Given an undirected possibly weighted $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $\mathcal{P}\subseteq V^2$ of pairs, a subgraph $S=(V,E')$ is called a ${\cal P}$-pairwise $Ξ±$-spanner of $G$, if for every pair $(u,v)\in\mathcal{P}$ we have $d_S(u,v)\leqΞ±\cdot d_G(u,v)$. The parameter $Ξ±$ is called the stretch of the spanner, and its size overhead is define as $\frac{|E'|}{|{\cal P}|}$. A surprising connection was recently discussed between the additive stretch of $(1+Ξ΅,Ξ²)$-spanners, to the hopbound of $(1+Ξ΅,Ξ²)$-hopsets. A long sequence of works showed that if the spanner/hopset has size $\approx n^{1+1/k}$ for some parameter $k\ge 1$, then $Ξ²\approx\left(\frac1Ξ΅\right)^{\log k}$. In this paper we establish a new connection to the size overhead of pairwise spanners. In particular, we show that if $|{\cal P}|\approx n^{1+1/k}$, then a ${\cal P}$-pairwise $(1+Ξ΅)$-spanner must have size at least $Ξ²\cdot |{\cal P}|$ with $Ξ²\approx\left(\frac1Ξ΅\right)^{\log k}$ (a near matching upper bound was recently shown in \cite{ES23}). We also extend the connection between pairwise spanners and hopsets to the large stretch regime, by showing nearly matching upper and lower bounds for ${\cal P}$-pairwise $Ξ±$-spanners. In particular, we show that if $|{\cal P}|\approx n^{1+1/k}$, then the size overhead is $Ξ²\approx\frac kΞ±$. A source-wise spanner is a special type of pairwise spanner, for which ${\cal P}=A\times V$ for some $A\subseteq V$. A prioritized spanner is given also a ranking of the vertices $V=(v_1,\dots,v_n)$, and is required to provide improved stretch for pairs containing higher ranked vertices. By using a sequence of reductions, we improve on the state-of-the-art results for source-wise and prioritized spanners.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted