Automatically Finding and Categorizing Replication Studies
November 25, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Bob de Ruiter
arXiv ID
2311.15055
Category
cs.DL: Digital Libraries
Cross-listed
cs.CL
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
In many fields of experimental science, papers that failed to replicate continue to be cited as a result of the poor discoverability of replication studies. As a first step to creating a system that automatically finds replication studies for a given paper, 334 replication studies and 344 replicated studies were collected. Replication studies could be identified in the dataset based on text content at a higher rate than chance (AUROC = 0.886). Additionally, successful replication studies could be distinguished from failed replication studies at a higher rate than chance (AUROC = 0.664).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Digital Libraries
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
On the Performance of Hybrid Search Strategies for Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Systematic Identification and Analysis of Scientists on Twitter
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted