Connected Components in Linear Work and Near-Optimal Time

December 04, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alireza Farhadi, S. Cliff Liu, Elaine Shi arXiv ID 2312.02332 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Computing the connected components of a graph is a fundamental problem in algorithmic graph theory. A major question in this area is whether we can compute connected components in $o(\log n)$ parallel time. Recent works showed an affirmative answer in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model for a wide class of graphs. Specifically, Behnezhad et al. (FOCS'19) showed that connected components can be computed in $O(\log d + \log \log n)$ rounds in the MPC model. More recently, Liu et al. (SPAA'20) showed that the same result can be achieved in the standard PRAM model but their result incurs $Θ((m+n) \cdot (\log d + \log \log n))$ work which is sub-optimal. In this paper, we show that for graphs that contain \emph{well-connected} components, we can compute connected components on a PRAM in sub-logarithmic parallel time with \emph{optimal}, i.e., $O(m+n)$ total work. Specifically, our algorithm achieves $O(\log(1/λ) + \log \log n)$ parallel time with high probability, where $λ$ is the minimum spectral gap of any connected component in the input graph. The algorithm requires no prior knowledge on $λ$. Additionally, based on the \textsc{2-Cycle} Conjecture we provide a time lower bound of $Ω(\log(1/λ))$ for solving connected components on a PRAM with $O(m+n)$ total memory when $λ\le (1/\log n)^c$, giving conditional optimality to the running time of our algorithm as a parameter of $λ$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted