A Subexponential Time Algorithm for Makespan Scheduling of Unit Jobs with Precedence Constraints

December 06, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jesper Nederlof, CΓ©line M. F. Swennenhuis, Karol WΔ™grzycki arXiv ID 2312.03495 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In a classical scheduling problem, we are given a set of $n$ jobs of unit length along with precedence constraints, and the goal is to find a schedule of these jobs on $m$ identical machines that minimizes the makespan. Using the standard 3-field notation, it is known as $Pm|\text{prec}, p_j=1|C_{\max}$. Settling the complexity of $Pm|\text{prec}, p_j=1|C_{\max}$ even for $m=3$ machines is the last open problem from the book of Garey and Johnson [GJ79] for which both upper and lower bounds on the worst-case running times of exact algorithms solving them remain essentially unchanged since the publication of [GJ79]. We present an algorithm for this problem that runs in $(1+\frac{n}{m})^{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{nm})}$ time. This algorithm is subexponential when $m = o(n)$. In the regime of $m=Θ(n)$ we show an algorithm that runs in$\mathcal{O}(1.997^n)$ time. Before our work, even for $m=3$ machines there were no algorithms known that run in $\mathcal{O}((2-\varepsilon)^n)$ time for some $\varepsilon > 0$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted