Geometric Thickness of Multigraphs is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete

December 08, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Algorithmica

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Henry FΓΆrster, Philipp Kindermann, Tillmann Miltzow, Irene Parada, Soeren Terziadis, Birgit Vogtenhuber arXiv ID 2312.05010 Category cs.CG: Computational Geometry Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 0 Venue Algorithmica Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We say that a (multi)graph $G = (V,E)$ has geometric thickness $t$ if there exists a straight-line drawing $\varphi : V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ and a $t$-coloring of its edges where no two edges sharing a point in their relative interior have the same color. The \textsc{Geometric Thickness} problem asks whether a given multigraph has geometric thickness at most $t$. This problem was shown to be NP-hard for $t=2$ [Durocher, Gethner, and Mondal, CG 2016]. In this paper, we settle the computational complexity of \textsc{Geometric Thickness} by showing that it is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete already for thickness $30$. Moreover, our reduction shows that the problem is $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete for $4392$-planar graphs, where a graph is $k$-planar if it admits a topological drawing with at most $k$ crossings per edge. In the course of our paper, we answer previous questions on geometric thickness and on other related problems, in particular that simultaneous graph embeddings of $31$ edge-disjoint graphs and pseudo-segment stretchability with chromatic number $30$ are $\exists \mathbb{R}$-complete.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computational Geometry

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Dynamic Planar Convex Hull

Riko Jacob, Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal

cs.CG πŸ› The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings. πŸ“š 240 cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted