Topology-Dependent Privacy Bound For Decentralized Federated Learning

December 13, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Qiongxiu Li, Wenrui Yu, Changlong Ji, Richard Heusdens arXiv ID 2312.07956 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Citations 3 Venue IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Decentralized Federated Learning (FL) has attracted significant attention due to its enhanced robustness and scalability compared to its centralized counterpart. It pivots on peer-to-peer communication rather than depending on a central server for model aggregation. While prior research has delved into various factors of decentralized FL such as aggregation methods and privacy-preserving techniques, one crucial aspect affecting privacy is relatively unexplored: the underlying graph topology. In this paper, we fill the gap by deriving a stringent privacy bound for decentralized FL under the condition that the accuracy is not compromised, highlighting the pivotal role of graph topology. Specifically, we demonstrate that the minimum privacy loss at each model aggregation step is dependent on the size of what we term as 'honest components', the maximally connected subgraphs once all untrustworthy participants are excluded from the networks, which is closely tied to network robustness. Our analysis suggests that attack-resilient networks will provide a superior privacy guarantee. We further validate this by studying both Poisson and power law networks, showing that the latter, being less robust against attacks, indeed reveals more privacy. In addition to a theoretical analysis, we consolidate our findings by examining two distinct privacy attacks: membership inference and gradient inversion.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted