Validation of Rigorous Requirements Specifications and Document Automation with the ITLingo RSL Language

December 17, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Andre Rodrigues, Alberto Rodrigues da Silva arXiv ID 2312.10822 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Despite being an essential step in software development, writing requirements specifications is frequently performed in natural language, leading to issues like inconsistency, incompleteness, or ambiguity. The ITLingo initiative has introduced a requirements specification language named RSL to enhance the rigor and consistency of technical documentation. On the other hand, natural language processing (NLP) is a field that has been supporting the automatic analysis of requirements by helping to detect issues that may be difficult to see during a manual review. Once the requirements specifications are validated, it is important to automate the generation of documents for these specifications to reduce manual work, reduce errors, and to produce documentation in multiple formats that are more easily reusable or recognized by the different stakeholders. This paper reviews existing research and tools in the fields of requirements validation and document automation. We propose to extend RSL with validation of specifications based on customized checks, and on linguistic rules dynamically defined in the RSL itself. In addition, we also propose the automatic generation of documents from these specifications to JSON, TXT, or other file formats using template files. We use a fictitious business information system to support the explanation and to demonstrate how these validation checks can assist in writing better requirements specifications and then generate documents in multiple formats based on them. Finally, we evaluate the usability of the proposed validation and document automation approach through a user session.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted