Learning Top-k Subtask Planning Tree based on Discriminative Representation Pre-training for Decision Making

December 18, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Machine Intelligence Research

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jingqing Ruan, Kaishen Wang, Qingyang Zhang, Dengpeng Xing, Bo Xu arXiv ID 2312.11027 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 1 Venue Machine Intelligence Research Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many complicated real-world tasks can be broken down into smaller, more manageable parts, and planning with prior knowledge extracted from these simplified pieces is crucial for humans to make accurate decisions. However, replicating this process remains a challenge for AI agents and naturally raises two questions: How to extract discriminative knowledge representation from priors? How to develop a rational plan to decompose complex problems? Most existing representation learning methods employing a single encoder structure are fragile and sensitive to complex and diverse dynamics. To address this issue, we introduce a multiple-encoder and individual-predictor regime to learn task-essential representations from sufficient data for simple subtasks. Multiple encoders can extract adequate task-relevant dynamics without confusion, and the shared predictor can discriminate the task characteristics. We also use the attention mechanism to generate a top-k subtask planning tree, which customizes subtask execution plans in guiding complex decisions on unseen tasks. This process enables forward-looking and globality by flexibly adjusting the depth and width of the planning tree. Empirical results on a challenging platform composed of some basic simple tasks and combinatorially rich synthetic tasks consistently outperform some competitive baselines and demonstrate the benefits of our design.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted