The State of Documentation Practices of Third-party Machine Learning Models and Datasets

December 22, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Software

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ernesto Lang Oreamuno, Rohan Faiyaz Khan, Abdul Ali Bangash, Catherine Stinson, Bram Adams arXiv ID 2312.15058 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 9 Venue IEEE Software Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Model stores offer third-party ML models and datasets for easy project integration, minimizing coding efforts. One might hope to find detailed specifications of these models and datasets in the documentation, leveraging documentation standards such as model and dataset cards. In this study, we use statistical analysis and hybrid card sorting to assess the state of the practice of documenting model cards and dataset cards in one of the largest model stores in use today--Hugging Face (HF). Our findings show that only 21,902 models (39.62\%) and 1,925 datasets (28.48\%) have documentation. Furthermore, we observe inconsistency in ethics and transparency-related documentation for ML models and datasets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted