Finite-Time Frequentist Regret Bounds of Multi-Agent Thompson Sampling on Sparse Hypergraphs

December 24, 2023 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tianyuan Jin, Hao-Lun Hsu, William Chang, Pan Xu arXiv ID 2312.15549 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.MA, math.ST, stat.ML Citations 3 Venue AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We study the multi-agent multi-armed bandit (MAMAB) problem, where $m$ agents are factored into $ฯ$ overlapping groups. Each group represents a hyperedge, forming a hypergraph over the agents. At each round of interaction, the learner pulls a joint arm (composed of individual arms for each agent) and receives a reward according to the hypergraph structure. Specifically, we assume there is a local reward for each hyperedge, and the reward of the joint arm is the sum of these local rewards. Previous work introduced the multi-agent Thompson sampling (MATS) algorithm \citep{verstraeten2020multiagent} and derived a Bayesian regret bound. However, it remains an open problem how to derive a frequentist regret bound for Thompson sampling in this multi-agent setting. To address these issues, we propose an efficient variant of MATS, the $ฮต$-exploring Multi-Agent Thompson Sampling ($ฮต$-MATS) algorithm, which performs MATS exploration with probability $ฮต$ while adopts a greedy policy otherwise. We prove that $ฮต$-MATS achieves a worst-case frequentist regret bound that is sublinear in both the time horizon and the local arm size. We also derive a lower bound for this setting, which implies our frequentist regret upper bound is optimal up to constant and logarithm terms, when the hypergraph is sufficiently sparse. Thorough experiments on standard MAMAB problems demonstrate the superior performance and the improved computational efficiency of $ฮต$-MATS compared with existing algorithms in the same setting.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted