Linear-size Suffix Tries and Linear-size CDAWGs Simplified and Improved

January 09, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Acta Informatica

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shunsuke Inenaga arXiv ID 2401.04509 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.FL Citations 3 Venue Acta Informatica Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The linear-size suffix tries (LSTries) [Crochemore et al., TCS 2016] are a version of suffix trees in which the edge labels are single characters, yet are able to perform pattern matching queries in optimal time. Instead of explicitly storing the input text, LSTries have some extra non-branching internal nodes called type-2 nodes. The extended techniques are then used in the linear-size compact directed acyclic word graphs (LCDAWGs) [Takagi et al., SPIRE 2017], which can be stored with $O(el(T)+er(T))$ space (i.e. without the text), where $el(T)$ and $er(T)$ are the numbers of left- and right-extensions of the maximal repeats in the input text string $T$, respectively. In this paper, we present simpler alternatives to the aforementioned indexing structures, called the simplified LSTries (simLSTries) and the simplified LCDAWGs (simLCDAWGs), in which most of the type-2 nodes are removed. In particular, our simLCDAWGs require only $O(er(T))$ space and work on a weaker model of computation (i.e. the pointer machine model). This contrasts the $O(er(T))$-space CDAWG representation of [Belazzougui and Cunial, SPIRE 2017], which works on the word RAM model.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted