Using Large Language Models for Commit Message Generation: A Preliminary Study

January 11, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Linghao Zhang, Jingshu Zhao, Chong Wang, Peng Liang arXiv ID 2401.05926 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 22 Venue IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A commit message is a textual description of the code changes in a commit, which is a key part of the Git version control system (VCS). It captures the essence of software updating. Therefore, it can help developers understand code evolution and facilitate efficient collaboration between developers. However, it is time-consuming and labor-intensive to write good and valuable commit messages. Some researchers have conducted extensive studies on the automatic generation of commit messages and proposed several methods for this purpose, such as generationbased and retrieval-based models. However, seldom studies explored whether large language models (LLMs) can be used to generate commit messages automatically and effectively. To this end, this paper designed and conducted a series of experiments to comprehensively evaluate the performance of popular open-source and closed-source LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and ChatGPT, in commit message generation. The results indicate that considering the BLEU and Rouge-L metrics, LLMs surpass the existing methods in certain indicators but lag behind in others. After human evaluations, however, LLMs show a distinct advantage over all these existing methods. Especially, in 78% of the 366 samples, the commit messages generated by LLMs were evaluated by humans as the best. This work not only reveals the promising potential of using LLMs to generate commit messages, but also explores the limitations of commonly used metrics in evaluating the quality of auto-generated commit messages.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted