Computing Data Distribution from Query Selectivities
January 11, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Database Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Pankaj K. Agarwal, Rahul Raychaudhury, Stavros Sintos, Jun Yang
arXiv ID
2401.06047
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DB
Citations
0
Venue
International Conference on Database Theory
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We are given a set $\mathcal{Z}=\{(R_1,s_1),\ldots, (R_n,s_n)\}$, where each $R_i$ is a \emph{range} in $\Re^d$, such as rectangle or ball, and $s_i \in [0,1]$ denotes its \emph{selectivity}. The goal is to compute a small-size \emph{discrete data distribution} $\mathcal{D}=\{(q_1,w_1),\ldots, (q_m,w_m)\}$, where $q_j\in \Re^d$ and $w_j\in [0,1]$ for each $1\leq j\leq m$, and $\sum_{1\leq j\leq m}w_j= 1$, such that $\mathcal{D}$ is the most \emph{consistent} with $\mathcal{Z}$, i.e., $\mathrm{err}_p(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{Z})=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\! \lvert{s_i-\sum_{j=1}^m w_j\cdot 1(q_j\in R_i)}\rvert^p$ is minimized. In a database setting, $\mathcal{Z}$ corresponds to a workload of range queries over some table, together with their observed selectivities (i.e., fraction of tuples returned), and $\mathcal{D}$ can be used as compact model for approximating the data distribution within the table without accessing the underlying contents. In this paper, we obtain both upper and lower bounds for this problem. In particular, we show that the problem of finding the best data distribution from selectivity queries is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete. On the positive side, we describe a Monte Carlo algorithm that constructs, in time $O((n+Ξ΄^{-d})Ξ΄^{-2}\mathop{\mathrm{polylog}})$, a discrete distribution $\tilde{\mathcal{D}}$ of size $O(Ξ΄^{-2})$, such that $\mathrm{err}_p(\tilde{\mathcal{D}},\mathcal{Z})\leq \min_{\mathcal{D}}\mathrm{err}_p(\mathcal{D},\mathcal{Z})+Ξ΄$ (for $p=1,2,\infty$) where the minimum is taken over all discrete distributions. We also establish conditional lower bounds, which strongly indicate the infeasibility of relative approximations as well as removal of the exponential dependency on the dimension for additive approximations. This suggests that significant improvements to our algorithm are unlikely.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted