SBFT Tool Competition 2024 -- Python Test Case Generation Track

January 26, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2024 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based and Fuzz Testing (SBFT)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nicolas Erni, Al-Ameen Mohammed Ali Mohammed, Christian Birchler, Pouria Derakhshanfar, Stephan Lukasczyk, Sebastiano Panichella arXiv ID 2401.15189 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 6 Venue 2024 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based and Fuzz Testing (SBFT) Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Test case generation (TCG) for Python poses distinctive challenges due to the language's dynamic nature and the absence of strict type information. Previous research has successfully explored automated unit TCG for Python, with solutions outperforming random test generation methods. Nevertheless, fundamental issues persist, hindering the practical adoption of existing test case generators. To address these challenges, we report on the organization, challenges, and results of the first edition of the Python Testing Competition. Four tools, namely UTBotPython, Klara, Hypothesis Ghostwriter, and Pynguin were executed on a benchmark set consisting of 35 Python source files sampled from 7 open-source Python projects for a time budget of 400 seconds. We considered one configuration of each tool for each test subject and evaluated the tools' effectiveness in terms of code and mutation coverage. This paper describes our methodology, the analysis of the results together with the competing tools, and the challenges faced while running the competition experiments.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted