CMSA algorithm for solving the prioritized pairwise test data generation problem in software product lines

February 07, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of Heuristics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Javier Ferrer, Francisco Chicano, JosΓ© Antonio Ortega Toro arXiv ID 2402.04597 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.SE Citations 14 Venue Journal of Heuristics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In Software Product Lines (SPLs) it may be difficult or even impossible to test all the products of the family because of the large number of valid feature combinations that may exist. Thus, we want to find a minimal subset of the product family that allows us to test all these possible combinations (pairwise). Furthermore, when testing a single product is a great effort, it is desirable to first test products composed of a set of priority features. This problem is called Prioritized Pairwise Test Data Generation Problem. State-of-the-art algorithms based on Integer Linear Programming for this problema are faster enough for small and medium instances. However, there exists some real instances that are too large to be computed with these algorithms in a reasonable time because of the exponential growth of the number of candidate solutions. Also, these heuristics not always lead us to the best solutions. In this work we propose a new approach based on a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm called Construct, Merge, Solve & Adapt. We compare this matheuristic with four algorithms: a Hybrid algorithm based on Integer Linear Programming ((HILP), a Hybrid algorithm based on Integer Nonlinear Programming (HINLP), the Parallel Prioritized Genetic Solver (PPGS), and a greedy algorithm called prioritized-ICPL. The analysis reveals that CMSA results in statistically significantly better quality solutions in most instances and for most levels of weighted coverage, although it requires more execution time.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted