Anonymizing Test Data in Android: Does It Hurt?

February 12, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Elena Masserini, Davide Ginelli, Daniela Micucci, Daniela Briola, Leonardo Mariani arXiv ID 2402.07460 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0 Venue International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Failure data collected from the field (e.g., failure traces, bug reports, and memory dumps) represent an invaluable source of information for developers who need to reproduce and analyze failures. Unfortunately, field data may include sensitive information and thus cannot be collected indiscriminately. Privacy-preserving techniques can address this problem anonymizing data and reducing the risk of disclosing personal information. However, collecting anonymized information may harm reproducibility, that is, the anonymized data may not allow the reproduction of a failure observed in the field. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation about the impact of privacy-preserving techniques on the reproducibility of failures. In particular, we study how five privacy-preserving techniques may impact reproducibilty for 19 bugs in 17 Android applications. Results provide insights on how to select and configure privacy-preserving techniques.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted