iJTyper: An Iterative Type Inference Framework for Java by Integrating Constraint- and Statistically-based Methods
February 15, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Zhixiang Chen, Anji Li, Neng Zhang, Jianguo Chen, Yuan Huang, Zibin Zheng
arXiv ID
2402.09995
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
3
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Inferring the types of API elements in incomplete code snippets (e.g., those on Q&A forums) is a prepositive step required to work with the code snippets. Existing type inference methods can be mainly categorized as constraint-based or statistically-based. The former imposes higher requirements on code syntax and often suffers from low recall due to the syntactic limitation of code snippets. The latter relies on the statistical regularities learned from a training corpus and does not take full advantage of the type constraints in code snippets, which may lead to low precision. In this paper, we propose an iterative type inference framework for Java, called iJTyper, by integrating the strengths of both constraint- and statistically-based methods. For a code snippet, iJTyper first applies a constraint-based method and augments the code context with the inferred types of API elements. iJTyper then applies a statistically-based method to the augmented code snippet. The predicted candidate types of API elements are further used to improve the constraint-based method by reducing its pre-built knowledge base. iJTyper iteratively executes both methods and performs code context augmentation and knowledge base reduction until a termination condition is satisfied. Finally, the final inference results are obtained by combining the results of both methods. We evaluated iJTyper on two open-source datasets. Results show that 1) iJTyper achieves high average precision/recall of 97.31% and 92.52% on both datasets; 2) iJTyper significantly improves the recall of two state-of-the-art baselines, SnR and MLMTyper, by at least 7.31% and 27.44%, respectively; and 3) iJTyper improves the average precision/recall of the popular language model, ChatGPT, by 3.25% and 0.51% on both datasets.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted