iJTyper: An Iterative Type Inference Framework for Java by Integrating Constraint- and Statistically-based Methods

February 15, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zhixiang Chen, Anji Li, Neng Zhang, Jianguo Chen, Yuan Huang, Zibin Zheng arXiv ID 2402.09995 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 3 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Inferring the types of API elements in incomplete code snippets (e.g., those on Q&A forums) is a prepositive step required to work with the code snippets. Existing type inference methods can be mainly categorized as constraint-based or statistically-based. The former imposes higher requirements on code syntax and often suffers from low recall due to the syntactic limitation of code snippets. The latter relies on the statistical regularities learned from a training corpus and does not take full advantage of the type constraints in code snippets, which may lead to low precision. In this paper, we propose an iterative type inference framework for Java, called iJTyper, by integrating the strengths of both constraint- and statistically-based methods. For a code snippet, iJTyper first applies a constraint-based method and augments the code context with the inferred types of API elements. iJTyper then applies a statistically-based method to the augmented code snippet. The predicted candidate types of API elements are further used to improve the constraint-based method by reducing its pre-built knowledge base. iJTyper iteratively executes both methods and performs code context augmentation and knowledge base reduction until a termination condition is satisfied. Finally, the final inference results are obtained by combining the results of both methods. We evaluated iJTyper on two open-source datasets. Results show that 1) iJTyper achieves high average precision/recall of 97.31% and 92.52% on both datasets; 2) iJTyper significantly improves the recall of two state-of-the-art baselines, SnR and MLMTyper, by at least 7.31% and 27.44%, respectively; and 3) iJTyper improves the average precision/recall of the popular language model, ChatGPT, by 3.25% and 0.51% on both datasets.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted