A "User Experience 3.0 (UX 3.0)" Paradigm Framework: User Experience Design for Human-Centered AI Systems
March 03, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Wei Xu
arXiv ID
2403.01609
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
The human-centered artificial intelligence (HCAI) design approach, the user-centered design (UCD) version in the intelligence era, has been promoted to address potential negative issues caused by AI technology; user experience design (UXD) is specifically called out to facilitate the design and development of human-centered AI systems. Over the last three decades, user experience (UX) practice can be divided into three stages in terms of technology platform, user needs, design philosophy, ecosystem, scope, focus, and methodology of UX practice. UX practice is moving towards the intelligence era. Still, the existing UX paradigm mainly aims at non-intelligent systems and lacks a systematic approach to address UX for designing and developing human-centered AI products and systems. The intelligence era has put forward new demands on the UX paradigm. This paper proposes a "UX 3.0" paradigm framework and the corresponding UX methodology for UX practice in the intelligence era. The "UX 3.0" paradigm framework includes four categories of emerging experiences in the intelligence era: ecosystem-based experience, innovation-enabled experience, AI-enabled experience, and human-AI interaction-based experience, each compelling us to enhance current UX practice in terms of design philosophy, scope, focus, and methodology. We believe that the "UX 3.0" paradigm helps enhance existing UX practice and provides methodological support for the research and applications of UX in developing human-centered AI systems. Finally, this paper looks forward to future work implementing the "UX 3.0" paradigm.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted